Dell plant closure points to deeper problems with job creation

SUNDAY, OCTOBER 11, 2009

(Updated 7:57 am)
By RICHARD M. BARRON
Staff Writer

Accompanying Photos

Nelson Kepley

Photo Caption:The Dell plant in Winston-Salem.

Additional Photos

Just the name — Dell — seemed to promise the Triad and North Carolina a future economy driven by clean, high-tech industry.

Local industrial recruiters could practically print it on their business cards, Dell’s halo effect was so strong.

By January, however, the company will be gone, leaving behind 905 jobless workers and an empty building that “will essentially be an empty ghost,” one company official said.

Just five years ago, the prospect of Dell and the $500 million FedEx hub at Piedmont Triad International Airport were transformational. What once had been an old-world regional economy of smokestack manufacturing was to become a thriving whoosh of companies that build, pack and ship with the speed and precision of modern technology.

Now Dell is on its way out, and the FedEx hub, though newly opened, is not operating at nearly the projected level of flights or employment.

But business experts are taking heart in the regional strengths that recruited those companies. Those strengths, they say, are undiminished.

Even now, economic recruiters say, major companies are scouting the Triad for possible locations. In the past six months, 10 companies have announced expansions adding up to several hundred jobs.

That’s not enough to absorb the sting of Dell, but it is enough to prove that our economy has a hearty pulse, said Penny Whiteheart, executive vice president of the Piedmont Triad Partnership, a regional economic development group.

“We thought Dell was a home run,” she said. “And we’ll just have to continue to hit some singles and doubles to regain those thousand jobs.”

‘The sweet spot’

Dell and FedEx, many say, remain strong proof that the Triad is succeeding in building a stronger economy despite the strains of a worldwide financial crisis.

It all comes down to:

  • A solid work force that has necessary skills and access to quality training.
  • A highway network that has capacity for the tremendous amount of over-the-road freight needed to supply the Eastern seaboard.
  • The FedEx hub, which has become a key piece of the region’s infrastructure, said John Kasarda, director of the Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise and the Kenan Distinguished Professor of Strategy and Entrepreneurship at UNC-CH.

“You have to remember that Dell’s decision (to locate here) was made primarily because they needed an East Coast location, because they needed overnight shipping for their customer base,” Kasarda said. “Triad first, Winston-Salem second because of road accessibility. That road accessibility was also a factor in FedEx’s decision. …

“The Triad is in the sweet spot.”

High-tech in name only

Although the Triad liked to think of Dell as a high-tech employer, the actual work — and wages — inside the plant were more akin to historical manufacturing jobs.

“We looked at the Dell project with rose-colored glasses,” said Rob Bencini, a private economic developer who once oversaw economic development for Guilford County.

“We saw Dell as a high-tech operation,” he said. “They were dealing with high-tech components, but the actual jobs being performed were not terribly technical in nature.”

Those jobs paid about $12 to $15 an hour for workers with basic manufacturing skills. They were jobs meant for the same types of workers displaced from the furniture or textile jobs lost in the past two decades.

Essentially snapping pre-formed computer components together, the jobs weren’t high-tech in any scientific sense, Kasarda said.

He tells a story about giving a speech in South America when a member of his audience challenged Kasarda to remember that it’s not the industry that makes good jobs.

“’It seems to me you have it wrong,’” Kasarda quoted the man as saying. “’It’s not the industry but it’s the occupation that’s important.’

“ ‘We could be producing computer parts, but what’s the difference in producing shoes?’ ” the man said.

Kasarda said Dell’s jobs were good only for a work force in transition from traditional manufacturing to an economy where training and education create far more advanced workers.

Working at Dell offered a certain prestige, but “it just shows the fact that any economy that’s in transition, it’s those at the bottom of the economic ladder that suffer most,” he said.

The speed of change

Dell’s departure also demonstrates the blinding pace of change in business today, Bencini said.

“It’s unfortunate it ended so quickly,” he said. “If it had been a 10- to 15-year run, in technology you can’t be surprised by that. But four years is quick.”

Kasarda blames the national recession for Dell’s departure. Companies looking to cut costs dramatically have virtually halted spending on new technology. That hit computer makers such as Dell hard.

Dell can teach the Triad lessons about the pace of global change, said Dan Lynch, president of the Greensboro Economic Development Alliance.

Just four years ago, Dell was confident enough in its desktop computer products to invest $130 million in the Forsyth County plant — with a little help from $280 million in promised state and local incentives.

Now sales of desktop computers — those made in Forsyth County — are dropping and laptop sales are rising. These days, the profit is in services, not hardware.

“Everything seems to be much more compressed now,” Lynch said. “The life span of industry may just be getting shorter.”

It wasn’t always like that. The Triad’s mainstay manufacturing base — tobacco, textiles and furniture — served it well for decades. A person could come out of high school, get a job at a plant and earn a good living over time.

But that way of life began falling apart nearly 20 years ago. Tens of thousands of jobs disappeared as companies either folded or moved work to cheaper labor forces overseas.

Then, in 1998, FedEx entered the picture, and the Triad’s economic future changed forever.

Never the same again

FedEx needed a package-sorting hub to service the East Coast. It looked up and down the Eastern U.S. and liked what it saw at Piedmont Triad International Airport and the greater region.

To capitalize on that — and dig out of the old economy’s wreckage — local economic developers charted new strategies.

They wanted to target certain industries, educate workers for specific careers and form aggressive partnerships with governments to pay big incentive packages.

Interstates 40 and 85 were expanded, a southern loop was built in Greensboro, and PTI got a new network of swift access roads.

The promise of FedEx’s arrival drew worldwide attention and has already attracted a Polo Ralph Lauren distribution center in High Point and the air-conditioning division of Rheem Manufacturing Co. in Randleman, whose parts distribution center will depend on express shipping.

The global recession these past two years has dampened other growth at the FedEx hub, Lynch said, and gains in productivity will reduce the company’s projected peak work force of 1,600.

“The fact that the delay at PTI occurred has nothing to do with PTI or the interest in the Piedmont Triad region,” Kasarda said.

Kasarda and Henry Isaacson, chairman of the Piedmont Triad Airport Authority, agree that FedEx is highly unlikely to abandon or keep its hub on slowdown for long.

FedEx will become the kind of magnet for other businesses that its backers have promoted for more than a decade, Isaacson said.

“I’m very, very sure,” Isaac son said. “We went to see two new businesses last week and we talk about FedEx, we talk about the new runway (at PTI). … They’re there, they’re up and running, and there’s no reason to believe that they’re not the magnet we have always believed that they would be.”

Lynch said he has always cautioned against over-selling the merits of any one business. Instead, he advocates a careful strategy that involves targeting areas such as health care, aerospace and advanced manufacturing/logistics.

“I was always guarded with FedEx because there was a little too much hype,” he said. “It was never, ever going to be a silver bullet.”

Staying focused

In the past decade, Lynch’s group and Winston-Salem Business, that city’s economic development group, have worked together to coordinate recruitment of some companies. They will work with the High Point Economic Development Corp. to help market the half-million-square-foot building Dell leaves behind.

Even now, Bob Leak Jr., the president of Winston-Salem Business, intends to use Dell’s name as he markets the city. He is proud that Winston-Salem had what it takes to draw such a company.

Bencini said no strategy should rely heavily on the logistics business as the next big thing. Such companies thrive on good road networks and warehouse and distribution space. He believes the jobs will not be as plentiful or well-paying as many expect.

Greensboro and the Triad are on the right track by channeling education money into health fields and aerospace, Bencini said.

And regional leaders, he said, should make sure workers learn about innovation. That, after all, led to RF Micro Devices — a homegrown microchip company that, despite bad times, is succeeding with sophisticated wireless components and employs 1,400 locally.

To be safe, Lynch said, it’s important to prepare Greensboro to recruit companies in advanced manufacturing and logistics in tandem. Each can support the other, he said, and blunt deficiencies.

Lynch plans to keep tweaking his recruitment strategy. But like a football coach rebuilding after losing a key player, he doesn’t plan to let Dell’s departure rattle him.

“You keep focused on what’s going on globally,” he said. “You change when needed, but you don’t get sidetracked by short-term market fluctuations.”

Contact Richard M. Barron at 373-7371 or richard.barron@news-record.com

Article on the announcement of the closing of the Dell plant in Winston-Salem.  Includes my comments.

http://www.news-record.com/content/2009/10/11/article/the_triads_allure_have_we_lost_it

Job Fair Reality

Seekers of all ages crowd in at job fair

THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 2008

(Updated 8:22 am)
By RICHARD M. BARRON
Staff Writer

GREENSBORO – Hundreds of persistent job seekers braved a hard rain and scarce parking to attend the Greensboro Chamber of Commerce’s Job Expo Wednesday.

At times, the line of people waiting to get in stretched outside the Guilford Convention Center at Interstate 40/Business 85 and Lee Street.

Some expressed surprise at the scores of job seekers crowding the tables of more than 60 businesses set up to recruit employees.

“I didn’t think there would be so many people here,” said Cynthia James, 43, who is just starting to look for a customer service job after five years out of the work force to help her son, his girlfriend and their baby.

“I just can’t believe this many people are out of a job,” she said.

People of all ages squeezed through the aisles, talking to representatives including the Army, Crown Automotive, Guilford County Schools and Mass Mutual.

Temporary services agencies had a high profile, and many were finding it hard to find exactly the right kinds of workers for their positions, despite the rising unemployment rate in the Piedmont Triad.

“It is an employer’s market right now, so they are looking for high skill,” said Barbara McNeill, with the Triad Adecco franchise.

She is working with a large company that needs accounting, human resources and payroll workers. She will have to recruit people from as far away as Pennsylvania to fill those jobs.

By 3 p.m., McNeill had seen about 100 prospective employees from unskilled to highly experienced, and she’ll be able to find work for about 50 percent of them.

“There seemed to be a direct correlation between pay and education and training,” said Rob Bencini, intergovernmental services director for Guilford County, who talked with many of the employers at the expo.

He said many jobs were paying as low as $10 an hour, especially for people with low skill levels.

“Many of the jobs are not careers, but they are work for now,” he said.

One company that’s looking for up to 100 workers with a range of skills is O’Reilly Auto Parts, which will open a distribution center in May. The company is looking for hourly workers through higher-level supervisors.

O’Reilly offers training to many of its employees to teach them its procedures and culture, said David Leonhart, the regional distribution center director.

Meanwhile, Vital Akimana was off to the side, trying to get used to the crush of a job expo. The Guilford College senior said he is starting the job hunt early so he can see what his options are.

A double major in peace and conflict and religious studies who lived his early life in Rwanda, Akimana is interested in mediation work or personal assistant administrative work.

“Anything that has the possibility to grow,” he said. “The amount of people in the building – it kind of seems a little crowded and hard to assimilate information.

“Students should probably have this experience because it might shock them at first.”

Contact Richard M. Barron at 373-7371 or richard.barron@news-record.com

Job fair comments.

http://www.news-record.com/content/2008/09/11/article/seekers_of_all_ages_crowd_in_at_job_fair

Subsidizing multi-family housing construction?

Perhaps it was done to garner support and a vote for Vice-Chairman Arnold’s proposed incentive rebate plan, but I cannot believe that the Guilford County Board of Commissioners is considering offering the same tax rebate to developers of multi-family housing in Guilford County. Put on the table for consideration by multi-family housing developer/Commissioner Mike Winstead, this self-serving motion does little to serve the best interests of Guilford County. Houses aren’t selling, largely impacted by too much supply; apartment rentals are barely holding their own. Greensboro’s population actually fell last year (more on that later) and somehow with all that, it makes good sense in the minds of some to further glut the market by offering tax rebates to mulit-family developers to build more housing – driving up vacancy rates and therefore hurting the profitability and operability of existing properties. And they are considering subsidizing this idea with tax dollars? Brilliant. As Mike Winstead is known for saying in incentive grant public hearings (paraphrasing): “I can’t believe that this amount of incentive money is a make or break issue for this project to decide to build here.” Perhaps true, Commissioner Winstead. The same could be said for this proposal as well. If the marketplace needs more multi-family housing, then builders will build it and the market will support it – without tax rebates.

Incentives plan is folly — and illegal

Over the last six weeks, we’ve heard and read about Vice-Chairman Arnold’s new incentive policy, which purportedly will offer assistance to small business by rebating their taxes on new and expanded facilities. The proposal seems to have general commissioner support and is looked upon favorably by at least one media editorial staff. It has been hailed as novel and potentially trend setting. Having been Guilford County’s first and only economic development director, having handled over twenty incentive projects since 2002, having written the policy that is currently in place, and being one of only 60 Certified Economic Developers in North Carolina, I am in a unique position to provide input on this proposal.

First, incentives may be granted to companies by local cities and counties under the authorization the state gives to these jurisdictions under NC General Statute 158-7.1. The statute specifies for what purpose and the methodology by which incentive grants may be approved. This law has been challenged twice in court and has passed judicial muster. It is the legal baseline for cities and counties to grant incentives. Among the specific steps is that all incentive consideration must undergo a public hearing with at least ten days advertised notice.

Vice-Chairman Arnold’s proposal does not pass this test of legality. But more alarmingly, the proposal violates the basic tenet of taxation in North Carolina: Except under very precise limitations (like returning tax overpayments), rebating taxes in North Carolinas is illegal. Specifically:

NC General Statute § 105 380. No taxes to be released, refunded, or compromised.

(a) The governing body of a taxing unit is prohibited from releasing, refunding, or compromising all or any portion of the taxes levied against any property within its jurisdiction except as expressly provided in this Subchapter.

But the good news is that there is a remedy.

(c) tax that has been released, refunded, or compromised in violation of this section may be recovered from any member or members of the governing body who voted for the release, refund, or compromise by civil action instituted by any resident of the taxing unit, and when collected, the recovered tax shall be paid to the treasurer of the taxing unit. The costs of bringing the action, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, shall be allowed the plaintiff in the event the tax is recovered.

So the Commissioners who vote to rebate or refund these taxes may get the chance to pay the County back for their largesse.

Jonathan Morgan from the UNC School of Government and former Justice Robert Orr concur that the proposal is not legal. Novel policy? Trying something that hasn’t been tried before? Sure, no one has tried this methodology – because it’s simply illegal About that there’s little question. One or eleven Guilford County commissioners supporting the proposed policy just doesn’t matter and makes it no more legal. Vice-chairman Arnold has been told this many times over the years yet he persists in this Quixotic quest to arbitrarily reduce taxes for developers.

Developers, you might ask? Yes, precisely. Before I go on, please understand that the development community did not put this proposal forward; it is a creature of the creative mind of Steve Arnold. Vice-Chairman Arnold has been a developer for years so he knows exactly who will benefit from his proposal.

This proposed policy has been promoted as a life-giving benefit to mom-and-pop stores and other small businesses that need help in expanding their business footprint or starting a new operation. This absurd depiction of what is likely to happen if this illegal policy is put in place is way out of touch with reality. The fact is that this policy would allow huge tax breaks to developers – including those from outside the region and out-of-state developers and builders – for the next Wal-Mart, or CVS drugstore, or the next strip center hosting a tanning salon, nail painting and another Subway restaurant. The sad truth is that this will almost certainly not help the small business itself. It will provide assistance to the owner/developer/builder (i.e. “taxpayer”) of the property, not the operator, except in that rare circumstance they are one in the same. Local “gentlemen’s club” expanding? Sure. Help the property owner and upfitter of the Alexander Devereaux property on High Point Road? Absolutely. These are the people that will get the bulk of the money from the policy: landowner, developer and builder – not the mom-and-pop storefront printer, florist or day care operator whom the proposal purports to assist. First illegal, now poorly developed and misguided.

Vice chairman Arnold knows that rebating taxes is illegal. Guilford County staff told him that repeatedly when he broached the subject over the years. But in the Commissioner’s zeal to eliminate costs and consequently reduce expense by cutting its experienced staff, they have once again made serious mistakes. It is certainly within the purview of the commissioners to handle budgetary matters in the way they see fit. In Guilford County’s case, scores of positions were eliminated to save money in the name of efficiency. It just seems pertinent that in the case of economic development it was only after staff reductions that Vice-Chairman Arnold pursued this questionable policy. The previous staff kept the commissioners out of this type of trouble, created the most aggressive local high-wage economic development policy in North Carolina – adopted in 2008 by the Board of Commissioners, and saved the County taxpayers $1 million in incentive grant payments from the three projects approved in 2008 alone. Now there is no one minding the store from the staff perspective. Inefficiency has certainly crept in. Not six months from eliminating the economic development staff, the Commissioners are dabbling in illegal and poorly thought through economic development activity. This proposed policy needs to be quickly and thoroughly dismissed.

All in the name of unskilled $12/hour jobs…

Greensboro’s plan to spur economic development by subsidizing the two project sites is legal but equal in folly to the County Commissioners’ plan. After paying millions to help cover some of the development costs, what’s the next step when the actual inhabitant of the property comes to town? Another incentive for the company. Helping build the site and then paying a company to expand or relocate is a double-hit. The projects will take decades to provide a financal return. This is a sure sign of desperation if we are willing to go to this level of overpayment all in the name of unskilled $12/hour jobs.

COMMISSIONER INCENTIVE PROPOSAL

Over the last six weeks, we’ve heard and read about Vice-Chairman Arnold’s new incentive policy, which purportedly will offer assistance to small business by rebating their taxes on new and expanded facilities. The proposal seems to have general commissioner support and is looked upon favorably by at least one media editorial staff. It has been hailed as novel and potentially trend setting. Having been Guilford County’s first and only economic development director, having handled over twenty incentive projects since 2002, having written the policy that is currently in place, and being one of only 60 Certified Economic Developers in North Carolina, I am in a unique position to provide input on this proposal.

First, incentives may be granted to companies by local cities and counties under the authorization the state gives to these jurisdictions under NC General Statute 158-7.1. The statute specifies for what purpose and the methodology by which incentive grants may be approved. This law has been challenged twice in court and has passed judicial muster. It is the legal baseline for cities and counties to grant incentives. Among the specific steps is that all incentive consideration must undergo a public hearing with at least ten days advertised notice.

Vice-Chairman Arnold’s proposal does not pass this test of legality. But more alarmingly, the proposal violates the basic tenet of taxation in North Carolina: Except under very precise limitations (like returning tax overpayments), rebating taxes in North Carolinas is illegal. Specifically:

NC General Statute § 105 380. No taxes to be released, refunded, or compromised.

(a) The governing body of a taxing unit is prohibited from releasing, refunding, or compromising all or any portion of the taxes levied against any property within its jurisdiction except as expressly provided in this Subchapter.

But the good news is that there is a remedy.

(c) tax that has been released, refunded, or compromised in violation of this section may be recovered from any member or members of the governing body who voted for the release, refund, or compromise by civil action instituted by any resident of the taxing unit, and when collected, the recovered tax shall be paid to the treasurer of the taxing unit. The costs of bringing the action, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, shall be allowed the plaintiff in the event the tax is recovered.

So the Commissioners who vote to rebate or refund these taxes may get the chance to pay the County back for their largesse.

Jonathan Morgan from the UNC School of Government and former Justice Robert Orr concur that the proposal is not legal. Novel policy? Trying something that hasn’t been tried before? Sure, no one has tried this methodology – because it’s simply illegal About that there’s little question. One or eleven Guilford County commissioners supporting the proposed policy just doesn’t matter and makes it no more legal. Vice-chairman Arnold has been told this many times over the years yet he persists in this Quixotic quest to arbitrarily reduce taxes for developers.

Developers, you might ask? Yes, precisely. Before I go on, please understand that the development community did not put this proposal forward; it is a creature of the creative mind of Steve Arnold. Vice-Chairman Arnold has been a developer for years so he knows exactly who will benefit from his proposal.

This proposed policy has been promoted as a life-giving benefit to mom-and-pop stores and other small businesses that need help in expanding their business footprint or starting a new operation. This absurd depiction of what is likely to happen if this illegal policy is put in place is way out of touch with reality. The fact is that this policy would allow huge tax breaks to developers – including those from outside the region and out-of-state developers and builders – for the next Wal-Mart, or CVS drugstore, or the next strip center hosting a tanning salon, nail painting and another Subway restaurant. The sad truth is that this will almost certainly not help the small business itself. It will provide assistance to the owner/developer/builder (i.e. “taxpayer”) of the property, not the operator, except in that rare circumstance they are one in the same. Local “gentlemen’s club” expanding? Sure. Help the property owner and upfitter of the Alexander Devereaux property on High Point Road? Absolutely. These are the people that will get the bulk of the money from the policy: landowner, developer and builder – not the mom-and-pop storefront printer, florist or day care operator whom the proposal purports to assist. First illegal, now poorly developed and misguided.

Vice chairman Arnold knows that rebating taxes is illegal. Guilford County staff told him that repeatedly when he broached the subject over the years. But in the Commissioner’s zeal to eliminate costs and consequently reduce expense by cutting its experienced staff, they have once again made serious mistakes. It is certainly within the purview of the commissioners to handle budgetary matters in the way they see fit. In Guilford County’s case, scores of positions were eliminated to save money in the name of efficiency. It just seems pertinent that in the case of economic development it was only after staff reductions that Vice-Chairman Arnold pursued this questionable policy. The previous staff kept the commissioners out of this type of trouble, created the most aggressive local high-wage economic development policy in North Carolina – adopted in 2008 by the Board of Commissioners, and saved the County taxpayers $1 million in incentive grant payments from the three projects approved in 2008 alone. Now there is no one minding the store from the staff perspective. Inefficiency has certainly crept in. Not six months from eliminating the economic development staff, the Commissioners are dabbling in illegal and poorly thought through economic development activity. This proposed policy needs to be quickly and thoroughly dismissed.